LiXiaoqi/minmea
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tests.c: work around spurious compiler error when comparing large ints

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kosma Moczek 2014-09-02 22:40:54 +02:00
parent a21389a66b
commit b763062f8d
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
tests.c
View File

@ -159,13 +159,15 @@ START_TEST(test_minmea_scan_f)
/* doesn't fit, bail out */ /* doesn't fit, bail out */
ck_assert(minmea_scan("2147483648", "f", &f) == false); ck_assert(minmea_scan("2147483648", "f", &f) == false);
} else if (sizeof(int_least32_t) == 8) { } else if (sizeof(int_least32_t) == 8) {
/* Casting to int64_t is ugly, but otherwise we get this on machines with 32-bit int_least32_t:
* error: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits] */
/* fits in 64 bits */ /* fits in 64 bits */
ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775807", "f", &f) == true); ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775807", "f", &f) == true);
ck_assert_int_eq(f.value, 9223372036854775807); ck_assert_int_eq((int64_t) f.value, 9223372036854775807LL);
ck_assert_int_eq(f.scale, 1); ck_assert_int_eq(f.scale, 1);
/* doesn't fit, truncate precision */ /* doesn't fit, truncate precision */
ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775.808", "f", &f) == true); ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775.808", "f", &f) == true);
ck_assert_int_eq(f.value, 922337203685477580); ck_assert_int_eq((int64_t) f.value, 922337203685477580LL);
ck_assert_int_eq(f.scale, 100); ck_assert_int_eq(f.scale, 100);
/* doesn't fit, bail out */ /* doesn't fit, bail out */
ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775808", "f", &f) == false); ck_assert(minmea_scan("9223372036854775808", "f", &f) == false);